Remote Booking Tools and eConsent Workflows

‍Reducing Friction in Participant Onboarding

In decentralised or hybrid trials, participant onboarding is often where momentum stalls. It’s not necessarily the volume of documents, but the fragmented nature of the process. Emails, attachments, scheduling back and forth, login links that expire. These are just some of many small inefficiencies that, collectively, chip away at participant engagement.

For participants, especially those unfamiliar with research studies, the early experience sets the tone. When that experience is scattered across multiple platforms and handled by different people, it can create confusion or even mistrust. Clear, well-sequenced onboarding gives people confidence in the study and encourages follow-through.

‍

The Role of Remote Booking Tools

Remote booking tools simplify the first point of coordination between participants and sites. When participants can:

• Choose their own screening appointment from a calendar

• View available time slots in their own time zone

• Receive confirmation messages and reminders without needing to ask

…they’re far more likely to show up. This isn’t just about convenience, it’s about reducing perceived effort. And for participants who may be considering multiple studies, that can be the deciding factor.

For research teams, it also reduces the admin burden. There’s less need for back and forth emails, fewer errors when copying time zones or names, and more visibility on who’s actually confirmed.

‍

Tightly Integrating with eConsent

Where remote booking tools are most valuable is when they’re connected to the rest of the onboarding workflow  particularly eConsent.

A typical participant experience might look like this:

1. A person receives a study invite via email or recruitment partner

2. They click a link and answer pre-screening questions

3. If eligible, they’re shown a list of available time slots

4. They choose one and automatically receive an appointment confirmation

5. That confirmation includes a link to review the consent form in advance

6. After the call or video visit, they can sign digitally then access the study app

At no point do they need to reach out manually. Everything flows naturally from step to step.

This doesn’t mean the process is impersonal. If anything, it makes it easier for study teams to focus on the conversations that matter. Instead of spending time coordinating calendars or resending documents, they can focus on explaining the study, answering questions, and building trust.

‍

Where This Model Works Best

Remote booking and integrated eConsent workflows work especially well in:

• Observational nutrition studies

• Studies with direct to participant data collection

• Early phase digital health pilots

These are studies where timelines matter, participant attention spans are short, and convenience can make the difference between an enrolled subject and a drop-off.

Even in higher-risk interventional trials, these tools have a role, not to replace conversations, but to make the process smoother and easier to manage at scale.

‍